"Cells Don’t Lie" and Foot-Long Blood Clots | Ask Dr. Drew
On its first day online (11/30/2022), Dr. Cole’s interview with Dr. Drew Pinsky and Dr. Kelly Victory saw Rumble views topping many previous well-known medical guests on the popular Ask Dr. Drew show. In this fast-paced and wide-ranging interview, you'll hear about Dr. Cole’s early connection to Dr. Drew through a hobby he still enjoys. Also, see the tissue and organ slides showing spike protein concentrations. Dr. Cole describes differences between the unvaccinated who have Long Covid concerns and those experiencing post-Covid-vaccination concerns. See the time markers below for further content in this must-see show.
For source information on this episode, find Dr. Drew's website here.
6:45 Concerns today with public health policy and Dr. Cole’s actions to counter the mistakes
9:00 Why has science and data not been followed with regard to the Covid “vaccine” rollouts?
16:00 Dr. Cole’s alarming concern about the pathway forward using this mRNA platform
17:20 Where are the other concerned pathologists?
21:40 Welcome Dr. Kelly Victory to the interview
22:45 Dr. Cole was the first person she knew who explained the why behind the clots. Dr. Cole explains that Covid is a “clotting disease” because of the spike protein. He shares slides and explanations about the Covid vaccine and it’s effects.
31:47 Dr. Kelly clarifies the spike protein discussion for non-medical understanding.
33:16 Dr. Cole explains how the Astra-Zeneca and Johnson & Johnson (J&J) shots differ from the other mRNA vaccines
“All scientists agree when you censor the ones who don’t.”
36:35 Cancer cell slides and discussion of increase in cancer post-vaccine rollout
43:00 Clots in living patients and discussion around amyloid
45:00 Clots in autopsy tissue and how these differ from typical blood clots postmortem.
49:45 Injury from Covid itself and injury from Covid injections is in essence, endotheliitis i.e. inflammation of the lining of the blood vessels.
50:45 Nattokinase can help with clotting. Dr. Kelly adds that it may help prevent Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s in Japanese population.
52:26 PERSISTENCE of spike protein via the Covid vaccine is concerning
55:35 Informed Consent should have included these inflammatory concerns
58:10 Not only were people not given Informed Consent, but were told falsehoods by the medical community and the pubic health agencies and the pharmaceutical companies
59:25 Alarming decreases in birth rates and fertility
1:03:00 Placenta concerns and Dr. Cole’s work to uncover pathology mechanisms
1:04:30 Groupthink gives us “Safe and Effective” but that is not reality
1:05:30 Obstetrician friend shared that leiomyosarcomas in vaginal tract and uterus are happening at rates never seen before
1:06:00 Very rapid junctional rhythms in young males being observed by Dr. Drew - is there a clinical reason?
1:08:10 Repressive nature of the entire pandemic including censorship and unwillingness to allow debate in medicine and science
1:11:00 Call to action for medical community to do the autopsies and the proper stains
The article presented its main points in a sensible order, which made the overall discussion easier to understand. I appreciated that it stayed focused rather than wandering into unrelated details. There were a few areas where I would have liked a little more explanation, but the main ideas came across clearly enough to keep me interested. Earlier today, I ran into Banglarbhumi reference while reading through a related conversation, and it reminded me that people often approach the same topic with very different levels of familiarity. It would be interesting to see more examples showing how the information applies in practice. Are there any plans to explore those details in another article?
When embalmers and coroners bring physical specimens onto live broadcasts to show structural differences between standard post-mortem jelly clots and fibrous, rubbery casts pulled from vascular trees, you have to look at the pathology objectively rather than turning it into an immediate partisan shouting match. Dr. Drew giving floor time to examine these anomalous white fibrous formations while demanding proper histological lab analysis is the only way genuine clinical medicine makes progress. I was reading a grounded conversation on scientific curiosity, evaluating medical evidence without bias, and critical thinking over at Veer Game this morning, and running formal mass spectrometry and protein sequencing on these tissue extractions is far more productive than dismissing observed anomalies without testing.
A major problem in public health discussions over the past few years has been the total breakdown of calm, transparent clinical dialogue between frontline practitioners and academic researchers. When physicians who observe unusual vascular presentations in clinical settings get shouted down instead of being handed rigorous research grants to study the tissue samples, everyday people naturally lose trust in health institutions. A health practitioner on Jai club was talking about medical ethics, encouraging open peer review, and bridging the gap between pathology labs and clinical trials yesterday, and having senior doctors host long-form forensic breakdowns helps restore nuanced scientific debate.